Aghora Volume III: The Law of Karma: 3

The author is Ayurvedic consultant. The author is said to have had acquainted with his guru while the former was studying in India. we ourselves have been to India 4 times and well acquainted with Vedic religion ( what is commonly mistaking called Hinduism ), we enjoyed the author's rather poetic use of the concept of Karma. However, the word of caution here. The concept of karma is so misused by many unscrupulous gurus to exploit the mass,it is fundamental to realise, no human can define, or describe someone's karma. It is necessary to read many books on this subject to broaden the understandings of others' view, but it is dangerous and foolish to accept any view without testing it oneself.If one read this book as one of many views, good and fair, but if one takes whole of what is written in this book, then one commits error. This book is a fun to read, but not to be read as a definite text on karma.

Expanded information from books 1 and 2. Fascinating

Very good

I bought it for my wife and it is intriguing indeed. Highly recommended for people opting to know about spirituality. Don't forget to read the first two before hoping onto this one.

Must to complete the last book. I have gone through with no much personal analysis of the narration of Dr. Robert ES, about Aghora Saint Vimalananda, in his vol1 & 2 but by the time I am about to complete 6th chapter in Vol. III, book3 of the sequel it forced me to do little of my IQ test. It started with race course and lot of narration on Horse related to race course. In-between many examples of Akbar, Birbal of whome Saint Aghora Vimalananda was a fan of as his Master's too was on Mughul Emperor. It's all fine, we can digest the good part of Mughal Emperor but by the time am concluding 6th chapter reading, titled City of Delusion here it forced me to vomit out as my digestive enzymes are not accepting the narration. Attached are pictures shot by mobile camara.Adi Shankara set an example, this point is missed in the narration. It made very strong conclusions but without considering what was state of Sanathana Dharma, Vedic life during that period. Here author compromised to say Mughul Emperor as great and intelligent, without using the words Gnani or Vignani but has concluded, Adi Shankara betrayed his mother and just as a jnani.Let's look at the episode of first spiritual Guru Lord Shiva. Shiva too has to obey the law of karma by serving 7½ years in a tree bark. Can we say Lord Shiva as agnani or limited to powers less than to Saturn.Readers, please just don't get carried away. Made very good reviews on Vol I & II, and here too am making a good point about law of karma is well explained. But, missed the target by forgetting that the Vedantic life of India is restored by only Adi Shankara. He intentionally surrendered to a chandala to bring social reform, and intentionally used parakaaya pravesha and made a compulsion that every Sanyasi should serve Al the 4 aashrama dharma.Alas, criticism is allowed in Sanatha Dharma which allows both right and left handism practices.

This total series can change ones view towards life.