Anti-Gravity and the World Grid (Lost Science (Adventures Unlimited Press))

Interesting read

I could literally not put this down!. I am floored by the information and data in this book. If you are a serious metaphysician and scientist, and a dowser and free, independent thinker, you will absolutely love this book. Incredibly thought provoking and intelligently written. A must for all who seek answers that conventional science seems to never answer. You will have a whole new perspective of your reality.....and....how to create a new, better one.

I was curious about the Lay Lines so I bout this. Very good book.

This was a decent book. There certainly are Energy Grids on Earth, but I question some of the author's opinions on them. One article in particular that I felt was pretty good is "Diamagnetic Gravity Vortexes", however, I do have a criticism of the author.Dr. Richard LeFors Clark wrote "Diamagnetic Gravity Vortexes", which is in this book. It is an interesting article, but the key points he makes, such as the fact that the North and South poles of magnetism reverse their polarity in the Bloch Wall (at the exact center of the magnet) in a broken figure eight pattern (he calls it a 'bow tie'), and that each magnetic pole has the opposite vortex spin (North pole spins counterclockwise, South pole spins clockwise), were all discoveries first made by Albert Roy Davis, yet Clark doesn't even mention Davis in the article. That particular information and diagrams 5, 6 and 7 on page 63, and diagram 8 on page 65 were taken from "Magnetism and Its Effects on the Living System", written by Albert Roy Davis and Walter C. Rawls, Jr. Clark's article is also mentioned numerous times in "The Shift of the Ages", by David Wilcock, but again, no acknowledgment or credit is given to Albert Roy Davis, the scientist who actually made those revolutionary breakthroughs. David Hatcher Childress did give credit to Davis and Rawls on page 10, the entire contents of which came from the above mentioned book, but he surely must have known that Clark was using their work and not crediting them for it because diagram 5 on page 63 is the exact same diagram on page 10, taken from Davis and Rawls' book.It's interesting to note that torsion fields are said to have either a left handed or a right handed spin, or "torsion". They are also said to have either a pushing or pulling effect in the universe. Is it just another coincidence that Davis and Rawls discovered that North pole magnetism CONTRACTS (attraction) matter, while South pole magnetism EXPANDS (repulsion) matter? In fact, they wrote in "The Magnetic Effect" that the North pole has a pulling effect and the South pole has a pushing effect. So which is it, the chicken or the egg? Are torsion fields the more basic, more important energy? Based on the discoveries of Davis and Rawls the torsion field proponents have it wrong. MAGNETISM is the most basic energy, not torsion fields, nor electricity or gravity for that matter. And the evidence of this is that magnetism/electromagnetism PRODUCES "torsion fields", it isn't the other way around. Of course, those espousing the importance of torsion fields don't mention magnetism too often because the parallels between what they are saying and what Davis and Rawls stated in their books many years earlier would become quite apparent. Walter Rawls has stated that magnetic fields change form, so even if they can't be measured with current technology, they are there nonetheless. Here is a related quote from Rawls. "The search for the ultimate nature of reality has to come from the acceptance and development of the two different controlling energies of magnetism." Magnetism is THE FOUNDATION of physics. Going back to at least the 1970's Davis and Rawls foresaw that the Russians (among many others) would try to take credit for some of their discoveries, they just hadn't yet figured out how. Now we know. They decided to give them a new name and use synonyms to describe them. It's the Russian "torsion physics", or "torsion fields".To quote Davis and Rawls in their first book, "Gravity is a form of electromagnetic and physical magnetic results." In other words gravity is the RESULT of electromagnetic/magnetic energy, it is NOT a separate form or force of energy. Knowing this, we can see that anti-gravity is truly possible. In describing the center of the broken figure eight in the Bloch Wall, Davis and Rawls wrote "This is the center of the 180 degree phase change. This line indicated by the letter O further indicates that we have no magnetic lines of force that carry either the negative or positive pole effect at this position. Instead, we have a division or zero point of energy radiation."Davis was well known to the U.S. government as early as the 1940's, for example, he was an aeronautical electronics engineer during World War II when he worked on top secret aircraft. He wrote what was very likely the first scientific paper on the danger of radioactive fallout, in 1946. Congressman Bennett secured the government's acknowledgement in 1962 that Davis was one of the first to recognize the danger. In the 1940's Davis also informed the government that North pole magnetism could be the answer to cancer, which he and Rawls have since proven correct. Prior to meeting Davis, Rawls was an advisor to several U.S. Presidents, he worked with the CIA (he was even offered the position of Deputy Director of the CIA in the Nixon administration, which he declined a few months before Watergate), he was a UN consultant, and last but not least, an attorney. Davis and Rawls were "unofficial" consultants to the United States government on the use of magnetism. Many famous researchers have had a keen interest in their work including Buckminster Fuller (inventor of the geodesic dome), Harold Sherman (whom they worked with on ESP research), Dr. Robert Yerkes (founder of the Yerkes Primate Research Center), and many others.There are some articles in this book that are worth contemplating. The books by Davis and Rawls though, are ESSENTIAL reading. And their discoveries on how North pole magnetism affects animals and humans are even more exciting, such as the fact that it can extend our lifespans, increase our intelligence, and increase our psychic abilities! I'm interested in Coral Castle too, but you will learn a lot more about magnetism from reading books by Davis and Rawls than you will by reading "Magnetic Current" by Edward Leedskalnin. In addition to their books I highly recommend reading the article titled "The Scope of Biomagnetism", written by Davis and Rawls. It is on the Teslatech.info website. Walter Rawls has described biomagnetics as "the Shangri-La of Nature", and it is!

Good book. Interesting theory!

The book is fine but I have a small challenge with Childress and his ilk in their manner of presentation. They seem to be so desperate in their attempts to have their information accepted I get a definite feeling of bias. Probably nothing wrong with this, the information itself should provide sufficient substantiation. Perhaps I'm just as bias myself in my own way. As I get older I find I am not as tolerant as I was when I was younger.

VERY deep book. This is the book for the serious metaphysician.

Good book